We have run articles before in which we showed that Simon the Magician, aka Simon Magus, was a believer who sinned, not an unbeliever who sinned. See this article by Jody Dillow, this 1867 article by James Inglis, and this article by Zane Hodges, for more details.
Today I came across an article by Dr. Michael Heiser, a Logos Bible Software scholar. While most commentators and most scholars say that Simon Magus probably was an unbeliever (see, for example, Stanley Toussaint, s.v. “Acts,” BKC, p. 373; F. F. Bruce, Acts, pp. 179-84; I. Howard Marshall, Acts, pp. 156-60), I was pleased to see that Heiser stuck with what Luke says about Simon and concluded that he was a believer who sinned and then repented.
Here is part of Heiser’s article:
The book of Acts is a favorite of preachers, so you are likely familiar with the showdown in Acts 8:9–24 between Peter and Simon the Magician. Luke tells us that Simon had practiced his magic in a city in Samaria where he had been hailed as “God’s Great Power” [“the great power of God,” NKJV]. Simon heard the gospel preached by Philip and believed, but later, after Peter’s arrival, he tried to purchase the power of the Holy Spirit from Peter.
His name consequently has not been remembered for any great deeds, but for the payment of money for church office (“simony”). But is that all there is to the story? Hardly. Don’t look away now or you’ll miss what’s behind the magic…
But how could the Samaritans speak of Simon as though he were God? Well, Simon was able to do amazing things. We aren’t told if what he was doing was something he picked up learning magical trickery or enablement from a demonic power, but the effect was the same…Like many Jews and Christians, Samaritans considered one particular angel—the one in whom Yahweh’s name dwelled (Exod 23:20–23)—as the embodied Yahweh. Since this angel was viewed as a physical manifestation of the true God—the “Great Power”—Simon’s acts of magical power had convinced many Samaritans that he, too, was a fleshly manifestation of God.
It’s easy to see how Luke, writing in full knowledge of the incarnation of God in Christ, would have sought to use this encounter. The drama is palpable. Philip had taken the message that God had become man in Jesus Christ to Samaria, where they already had their own incarnate deity, Simon the Magician, “God’s Great Power.” Incredibly, Luke records that the power of the gospel broke through to Simon, moving him to embrace the message of Philip. And when he saw the signs and miracles Philip performed, “Great Power” was drained. So much for all that Hogwarts tuition!
From Luke’s account, Simon must have realized very quickly that his own repertoire of tricks, however stunning they were to the masses, fell far short of what he had seen from Philip. Simon’s conversion reads quite genuine. Luke is careful to note, though, that Simon saw the powerful deeds of Philip only after he believed, when he began accompanying Philip in the city (Acts 8:13). But he hadn’t seen anything yet.
Luke tells us that when the apostles at Jerusalem heard that the gospel had reached the Samaritans—a people hated by “pure” Jews for centuries (John 4:9)—they sent Peter and John not to investigate whether it was true, but to pray for the Samaritan believers that they might receive the same Holy Spirit (Acts 8:14–17) that had abided with them since the explosion of the gospel at Pentecost (Acts 2). This alone is a powerful message. Two Jewish men who had grown up with their own prejudices about the Samaritans didn’t doubt that the grace of God included people they had scorned. Nothing Jesus had promised was to be withheld from them.
Unfortunately, Simon had a lot to learn about the real Great Power. When Simon saw that the Samaritans upon whom Peter and John laid their hands had received the Holy Spirit (no doubt evidenced in some tangible, powerful way), he wanted to experience that power himself. That’s understandable. But where he went wrong was trying to pay for it (Acts 8:18–19). Peter rebuked him harshly, and Simon repented immediately (Acts 8:20–24).
Nevertheless, Simon’s name lives on in infamy. Because of his on-the-spot repentance, not to mention the fact that he’d probably only been a believer for at most a couple of weeks, it seems unreasonable to vilify Simon. In Simon, we have a man who was one day hailed as the incarnate God but the next repented at the words of a couple of fishermen. We should remember the broken heart more than the misguided gesture.
When inspired Scripture says that someone believed in Jesus, we are not at liberty to say that the person in question was a false professor. The issue is not what the person himself professes. The issue is what the Word of God professes to be true.
I also like Heiser’s analysis of the significance of Simon being called “the great power of God.” I think he is right that Luke is utilizing that fact to underline the amazing nature of this man coming to faith. Simon was not the great power of God, but he came to faith in the one who is, the Lord Jesus Christ. His coming to faith is indeed a magnificent testimony.
I agree with Heiser. Well done. The evidence is overwhelming that Simon has gotten a bad rap.
