Grace Evangelical Society

P.O. Box 1308, Denton, TX 76202
  • About
    • Home
    • Beliefs
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
  • Resources
    • Grace in Focus Blog
    • Grace in Focus International Blogs
    • Grace in Focus Radio
    • Grace in Focus Magazine
    • Free eBooks
    • Journal of the GES
    • Book Reviews
    • Partners in Grace Newsletter
    • Audio Messages
    • Videos
    • Email Subscription
    • Bookstore
    • Online Tracts
  • Store
    • Main Page
    • On Sale
    • Return Policy
    • Your Cart
    • Your Account
  • Events
  • Connect
    • Contact Us
    • Free Grace Church and Bible Study Tracker
    • Free Grace Jobs
    • Ministry Links
  • Donate
    • One Time Donation
    • Monthly Donation
    • Your Account
  • Search
Home
→
Grace in Focus Articles
→
Three Tragic Consequences of a Two-Party System

Three Tragic Consequences of a Two-Party System

March 1, 2017 by Brad Bell in Grace in Focus Articles

By Brad Bell

Protestant Theology has long been plagued by one of the same problems as American politics. Ironically, this problem has been around much longer in theology than our current government.

What is it?

A two-party system.

Long before our modern government took form, Protestant theological discussion became gridlocked by two polarized parties—the Calvinists and the Arminians.

Sadly, this two-party system continues to dominate Protestant Theology and stifle good research and edifying conversation.

I present three tragic consequences of the two-party system.

Pre-Determined Theological Categories

When two polarized theological frameworks dominate the landscape, it obscures the possibility that there could be other options. People tend to think in an either/or framework.

When talking with a Calvinist, the conversation goes like this:

“So, you’re not a Calvinist?”

“No, I don’t hold to any of the five points of Calvinism.”

“Then you must be an Arminian.”

“No…”

As well, we often see individuals of a Wesleyan/Arminian background complain on our YouTube channel that we are Calvinists because we believe in eternal security.

Why does it have to be either/or?

Why can’t we choose neither or other?

People often write off a theological concept out of hand because they identify it with the “other” party. What other option could there possibly be?

Often, one’s perception of the other party (and sometimes even their own) is not accurate. This leads to the second consequence.

Unclear Discussion

The dominance of these two groups can make it difficult to have clear theological discussions with others. While the two parties dominate theology, what falls under the labels of Calvinism and Arminianism is extremely broad. No doubt, many self-proclaimed “Calvinists” are appalled at what other self-proclaimed “Calvinists” believe. The titles are used to cover differing and often conflicting views. Conservative, fivepoint Orthodox Presbyterian Calvinists differ greatly in their theology from self-proclaimed Baptistic, fourpoint Calvinists.

The sweeping titles of Calvinism and Arminianism can make it difficult to get down to the level of discussing the actual concepts, and more fundamentally, the Word of God. This brings us to an even greater consequence of a two-party system.

Following Men Rather than God

It’s as if the Calvinists and Arminians cry out, “vote for us, or your vote doesn’t count.” There is pressure to identify oneself, to affiliate if you want to be accepted or have ministry opportunities. This obsession with labeling oneself and others as a Calvinist or Arminian often results in greater emphasis on historical and speculative theology than Biblical theology.

I once discussed the need for ongoing Biblical exegesis and research with a self-proclaimed Calvinist. He remarked that Calvin and the Reformers had already done that work. I was aghast! The message was that the Reformers had done the work of going back to the Word of God to formulate their Theology, so we don’t need to.

Calvin and Arminius were both Reformers (in fact, they were both ministers in the Reformed Church!) and the debates are still very much alive. How much more so is the need to be constantly renewed by God’s Word! Let’s scrap the two-party system and move the discussion back to where it needs to be, God’s Word.

____________________

Brad Bell is the Social Media Coordinator for Grace Evangelical Society.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Cart

Recently Added

February 2, 2023

Romans–Part 04–The Problem

Welcome to Grace in Focus radio. Today, Ken Yates and Kathryn Wright continue this short series about Romans. Jumping to Chapter 3, they begin with...
February 2, 2023

Are Believers Today Under the New Covenant? 

A pastor friend whom I’ll call Dave has been studying the New Covenant lately. We’ve had a few excellent conversations about it. I thought I’d...
February 1, 2023

Romans–Part 03–Wrath

Welcome to Grace in Focus radio. Today, Kathryn Wright and Ken Yates are continuing their discussion of the book of Romans. How is the book...

Grace in Focus Radio

All Episodes

Listen to Stitcher

Listen on Spotify

Grace In Focus Magazine

Grace In Focus is sent to subscribers in the United States free of charge.

Subscribe for Free

The primary source of Grace Evangelical Society's funding is through charitable contributions. GES uses all contributions and proceeds from the sales of our resources to further the gospel of grace in the United States and abroad.

Donate

Bookstore Specials

  • Inerrancy for Dummies $7.95 $5.00
  • Grace in Eclipse: A Study in Eternal Rewards (Second Edition) $15.00 $8.00
  • Confident in Christ, 2nd Edition $22.00 $5.00
  • Grudem Against Grace: A Defense of Free Grace Theology $15.00 $10.00
  • Here Walks My Enemy: The Story of Luis (Paperback) $6.95 $3.00
Grace Evangelical Society

(940) 270-8827 / ges@faithalone.org

4851 S I-35E Suite 203, Corinth, TX 76210
P.O. Box 1308, Denton, TX 76202

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube